Posted inClinical Negligence Issue 16

Provisional damages – failure and success in one case

Provisional damages – failure and success in one case Richard Smith In Lynch v Princess Alexandra Hospital [2026] EWHC 657 (KB) Mrs Justice Ellenbogen provided a very useful distillation of the law relating to claims for provisional damages, as well as an example of the careful application of that law…
Posted inClinical Negligence, Issue 16Tags:
Posted inClinical Negligence Issue 16

The application of Paul – strike out of a secondary victim claim in clinical negligence case

The application of Paul – strike out of a secondary victim claim in clinical negligence case Richard Smith MIM v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] EWHC 562 (KB) (17 March 2026) This case appears to be the first reported determination of a claim seeking damages as a Secondary…
Posted inClinical Negligence, Issue 16Tags: , ,
Posted inClinical Negligence Issue 16

Permission granted to withdraw an admission made pre-action and in the defence

Permission granted to withdraw an admission made pre-action and in the defence Richard Smith Ramsdale v Ditta and others [2026] EWHC 544 (KB) In this case the Claimant seeks damages against a number of Defendants alleging failures of diagnosis and management of chronic rhinosinusitis. He saw a number of medical…
Posted inClinical Negligence, Issue 16Tags: ,
Posted inIssue 11 Regulatory

Dishonesty and Denial – Part 2

Ahmedsowida v General Medical Council [2021] EWHC 3466 Sawati v General Medical Council [2022] EWHC 283 I wrote last year about developments in the guidance given by the High Court in cases of professional regulation on the effect on sanctions of unsuccessful denials of dishonesty (link here). The issue continues…
Posted inIssue 11, RegulatoryTags:
Posted inCosts Issue 11

Liability Determination Does Not Automatically Lead to Entitlement to Detailed Assessment

ABA v University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust [2022] EWHC B4 This case confirms a point of some significance for Claimant lawyers which must be borne in mind when liability issues are resolved either by judgment or settlement, leaving the quantum of damages to be assessed. The short point…
Posted inCosts, Issue 11Tags:
Posted inIssue 9 Regulatory

Dishonesty and Denial

Towuaghantse v GMC [2021] EWHC 681 (Admin) Al Nageim v General Medical Council [2021] EWHC 877 (Admin) The steady stream of appeals to the High Court from the Medical Practitioners Tribunal (“MPT”) against findings of dishonesty shows no sign of abating. Two recent cases have produced and illustrated guidance suggesting…
Posted inIssue 9, RegulatoryTags: ,
Posted inIssue 9 Personal injury Procedural Quantum

Proving the Dream – Evidencing Claims for Future Loss of Earnings as a Professional Footballer

TVZ v Manchester City Football Club Ltd [2021] EWHC 1179 (QB) Swansea City AFC v Owen [2021] EWHC 1539 (QB) Introduction Two recent cases highlight contrasting approaches by claimants to proving the level of earnings they could have expected to receive as professional footballers, but a generous approach by the…
Posted inIssue 9, Personal injury, Procedural, QuantumTags: